“In Massachusetts , an undocumented worker or uninsured sub-contractor

injured while working for an employer without workers’ compensation

insurance can file a claim for benefits with the state Workers’ Compensation

Trust Fund.  The trust fund has a duty to defend the claim or to pay the

appropriate benefits under the law.  It also has the authority to join the allegedly

uninsured employer to the proceedings.  The trust fund can also sue the

employer for any benefits it pays to the worker.  Funding for the trust fund

comes from annual assessments levied by the Department of Industrial

Accidents on all employers insured for workers compensation in the

Commonwealth.  In fiscal year 2005, the amount paid out for uninsured

injuries was $6,052,205 on 201 such claims.” 

The above paragraph was taken from the Standard which is an insurance industry publication
in their May 18, 2007.  The article highlights the problems that employers are facing in today’s
workers compensation market.   
  
        It has become a reality that employers who hire sub-contractors must
take extreme care that 1) the worker must be free from the presumed
employer’s control and direction, 2) the service provided by the worker must
be outside the employer’s usual course of business, 3) the workers must be
independently employed in the trade or occupation being provided to the
employer.  Otherwise, the employer is at risk of having that sub-contractor
considered as an “employee” by their own workers compensation carrier
even if that sub-contractor provides them with a certificate of insurance.  
      The problem arises that those unincorporated sub-contractors are normally
exempt from coverage on their own policies and certificates of insurance
indicate that.  Since they are not covered, they would be considered as
employees of the General Contractor.  In order to provide coverage for
themselves, the result could be a very large amount of premium that most
small contractors cannot easily afford. 
      The change in the independent contractor law shifted not only the
presumption that the worker was not an employee, but also who carries the
burden of proof, now it is the supposed employer that must prove that no
employment relationship existed.
 
                                                       
 Important Changes in Workers Compensation Regulation 
The workings of Workers’ Compensation policies have recently been adversely affected by
a change in the State of Massachusetts General laws. This new change drastically affects
how a General Contractor should consider his employees and sub-contractors.
 
Until recently, sub-contractors who had their own Commercial General Liability and Workers’
Compensation policies were considered to be within the laws so that when the General
Contractor faced an audit for his own Workers’ Compensation policy, those sub- contractors
would not be included in the calculations as long as a certificate of insurance was provided
showing active policies for the period of time work was performed..
 
Things have changed. The new rulings do not allow General Contractors to treat a sub-
contractor who does the same type of work as an independent operator, but rather as an
employee. This means that the General Contractor is now obligated to:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1) Withhold taxes, both State and Federal.
2) Withhold for FICA and match that amount. 
3) Have the sub-contractor covered as any other employee under his own Workers’
Compensation policy.
 
Example, you own a carpentry framing operation and you have 3 men working with you as
regular employees. On occasion, you hire a sub-contractor to help out if you should have a
large home to construct. Since you perform a framing operation and you hired another
framer to help you, he is now considered to be your employee, should be paid under a W2
and not a 1099, and have all of the benefits that you regular employees have.
 
There are many more examples of this happening every day. At this time, the companies
are just starting to apply the new rules when conducting an audit and some insured’s are
finding that their audit results are calling for much higher premiums than they expected.
 
*********
Another change is that as of November of 2004, sole proprietors and partners of a business
are now allowed to “Opt In” for coverage under their own Workers’ Compensation Policy. 
This allows them to be covered for benefits just as their employees are covered.  
 
I would expect that soon, any contractor who has no employees will be obligated to Opt In
for coverage so that his certificate of insurance will be acceptable to his General Contractor,
otherwise the company feels that should that sub-contractor get injured on the job, the
Workers’ Compensation policy will most likely have to provide the coverage.